Arctic
Invent
Case Registry
Dashboard
Case Explorer
Back to Explorer
Update Case Entry
Manually curate individual case documents inside the PostgreSQL engine.
Case Lawsuit Title
*
Case / Trial ID Number
Jurisdiction Code
*
us
in
upc
eu
Category
*
Patent
Trademark
Copyright
Design
Filing Date
Decision Verdict Date
Court / Tribunal
Bench / Panel Judges
Petitioner / Claimant (Plaintiff)
Mukesh Kumar Vidyarthi
Respondent / Defendant
Controller Of Patents New Delhi & Anr.
Dispute Summary
The petitioner filed an appeal regarding patent matters. The respondent argued that the examiner's report could not be placed on record due to confidentiality provisions under Section 144 of the Patents Act, 1970. The Court directed that the examiner's report be produced in a sealed cover for inspection.
Outcome / Ruling
interim_order
Verdict Document PDF URL
Full text judgment
Cancel
Update Case