Arctic
Invent
Case Registry
Dashboard
Case Explorer
Back to Explorer
Update Case Entry
Manually curate individual case documents inside the PostgreSQL engine.
Case Lawsuit Title
*
Case / Trial ID Number
Jurisdiction Code
*
us
in
upc
eu
Category
*
Patent
Trademark
Copyright
Design
Filing Date
Decision Verdict Date
Court / Tribunal
Bench / Panel Judges
Petitioner / Claimant (Plaintiff)
Astromed Health Care India Private Limited
Respondent / Defendant
Vinoth Kumar V
Dispute Summary
The Madras High Court granted leave to Astromed Health Care India Private Limited to institute and prosecute a Commercial Suit against Vinoth Kumar V, who claimed to be the registered proprietor of a trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and allegedly infringed the rights of the applicant's customers within the court's jurisdiction. The court allowed the application, considering the applicant's business within the jurisdiction and the alleged infringement. The decision enables the applicant to proceed with the Commercial Suit against the respondent. The case highlights the importance of jurisdiction in trademark infringement cases.
Outcome / Ruling
plaintiff_favorable
Verdict Document PDF URL
Full text judgment
[Cites 1 , Cited by 0 ] Madras High Court Astromed Health Care India Private ... vs Vinoth Kumar V on 17 July, 2026 A No. 3002 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A No. 3002 of 2026 in C.S.(Com.Div.)Dr.No.117660 of 2026 Astromed Health Care India Private Limited Rep.by its Director Mr.M.Sreenivasulu, No.3 Ponniamman Kovil Street, New Mahalakshmi Nagar, Noombal, Chennai 600 077. ..Applicant Vs Vinoth Kumar V S/o.Vijayakumar, ..Respondent Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 and Order III Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1862, to grant leave to the applicant/plaintiff to institute and prosecute the above Commercial Suit against the respondent/defendant before the Commercial Division of this Court. For Applicant : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar for Mr.Sudarshan B ORDER This application has been filed to grant leave to the applicant/plaintiff to institute and prosecute the above Commercial Suit against the respondent/defendant. __________ Page1 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3002 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU J. mp 2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 3. Considering the fact that the applicant carries on business within the jurisdiction of this Court and that the respondent claiming to be the registered Proprietor of the trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 has also infringed the rights of the applicant's of its customers within the jurisdiction of this Court. Hence, the leave sought for in this application is ordered as prayed for. 17-07-2026 mp A No. 3002 of 2026 in C.S.(Com.Div.)Dr.No.117660 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cancel
Update Case