Arctic
Invent
Case Registry
Dashboard
Case Explorer
Back to Explorer
Update Case Entry
Manually curate individual case documents inside the PostgreSQL engine.
Case Lawsuit Title
*
Case / Trial ID Number
Jurisdiction Code
*
us
in
upc
eu
Category
*
Patent
Trademark
Copyright
Design
Filing Date
Decision Verdict Date
Court / Tribunal
Bench / Panel Judges
Petitioner / Claimant (Plaintiff)
M/S.PVS Knittings
Respondent / Defendant
Fly Birds Garments
Dispute Summary
The Madras High Court granted leave to M/S.PVS Knittings to sue Fly Birds Garments for trademark infringement, considering a previous suit involving the same trademark had been decided in favor of the applicant. The court allowed the application as prayed for. This decision highlights the importance of previous judgments in trademark cases. The court's ruling will enable the applicant to proceed with the suit against the respondents.
Outcome / Ruling
plaintiff_favorable
Verdict Document PDF URL
Full text judgment
[Cites 0 , Cited by 0 ] Madras High Court M/S.Pvs Knittings vs Fly Birds Garments on 17 July, 2026 A No. 3020 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A No. 3020 of 2026 in C.S(com.div)Dr.No.119091 of 2026 M/S.PVS Knittings a registered partnership firm, No.3-h, Soosaiyapuram Colony Road, Rayapuram, Tiruppur 641 601 Rep.by Partner M.Ravi. ..Applicant Vs 1. Fly Birds Garments A Partnership firm, Rep.by its Partner P.Prakash, 819C, Raja Nagar, Boyampalayam, Tirupur 641 603. 2. P Prakash 3. N. Prakash ..Respondent Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 and Order III Rule 1 of O.S.Rules read with Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1862, to grant leave to sue the defendants before this court. For Applicant : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar ORDER This application has been filed to grant leave to sue the defendants before this court. __________ Page1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3020 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU J. mp 2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 3. Considering the fact that a suit in C.S. No. 182 of 2026 involving the very same trademark had been adjudicated upon and a decree was granted in favour of the applicant/plaintiff as against the 2nd respondent, the leave sought for in this application is granted as prayed for. 17-07-2026 mp Note: Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. A No. 3020 of 2026 in C.S(com.div)Dr.No.119091 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3020 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cancel
Update Case