Arctic
Invent
Case Registry
Dashboard
Case Explorer
Back to Explorer
Update Case Entry
Manually curate individual case documents inside the PostgreSQL engine.
Case Lawsuit Title
*
Case / Trial ID Number
Jurisdiction Code
*
us
in
upc
eu
Category
*
Patent
Trademark
Copyright
Design
Filing Date
Decision Verdict Date
Court / Tribunal
Bench / Panel Judges
Petitioner / Claimant (Plaintiff)
Masti Health and Beauty P. Ltd.
Respondent / Defendant
Shyam Investments, Savera Industries Ltd.
Dispute Summary
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal filed by Masti Health and Beauty P. Ltd. against Shyam Investments and Savera Industries Ltd. due to non-prosecution. The appellant had been granted multiple opportunities to proceed with the appeal but failed to do so. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. This decision highlights the importance of diligent prosecution of appeals in the Indian judicial system. The case underscores the need for parties to be prepared and to utilize the opportunities provided by the court to present their case.
Outcome / Ruling
defendant_favorable
Verdict Document PDF URL
Full text judgment
[Cites 1 , Cited by 0 ] Madras High Court Masti Health And Beauty P. Ltd vs Shyam Investments on 14 July, 2026 Author: P.Velmurugan Bench: P.Velmurugan O.S.A.(CAD)No.41 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14 / 07 / 2026 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI O.S.A.(CAD)No.41 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.4338 of 2022 Masti Health and Beauty P. Ltd., Plot No.230, Road No.78, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Shyam Investments, Represented by its Partners, Ms.Nina Reddy, No.1, Cathedral Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 086. 2. Savera Industries Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Mr.A.Ravikumar Reddy, No.146, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. ... Respondents Prayer: The Original Side Appeal is filed under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order dated 11.09.2020 in C.S.(Comm.)No.345 of 2011. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.(CAD)No.41 of 2022 For Appellant : Mr.K.Harishankar For Respondents : No appearance ***** JUDGMENT P.VELMURUGAN, J. This Appeal is of the year 2022. The matter was listed before this Court on 28.04.2026 and, at the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, it was adjourned. Thereafter, the matter was listed on 10.06.2026 and was again adjourned. The matter was thereafter listed on 24.06.2026. On that day also, the learned counsel for the appellant sought two weeks time. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned and listed today. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not ready to proceed with the Appeal. Despite sufficient opportunities having been granted, the appellant has failed to prosecute the Appeal. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.(CAD)No.41 of 2022 2. Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [P.V.J.,] [K.G.T.J.,] 14 / 07 / 2026 rns 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.(CAD)No.41 of 2022 P.VELMURUGAN. J. and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. rns To The Sub Assistant Registrar, (Original Side) Madras High Court, Chennai. O.S.A.(CAD)No.41 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.4338 of 2022 14 / 07 / 2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cancel
Update Case