Arctic
Invent
Case Registry
Dashboard
Case Explorer
Back to Explorer
Update Case Entry
Manually curate individual case documents inside the PostgreSQL engine.
Case Lawsuit Title
*
Case / Trial ID Number
Jurisdiction Code
*
us
in
upc
eu
Category
*
Patent
Trademark
Copyright
Design
Filing Date
Decision Verdict Date
Court / Tribunal
Bench / Panel Judges
Petitioner / Claimant (Plaintiff)
Chatur Knowledge Networking Pvt Ltd
Respondent / Defendant
The Registrar of Trademark & Ors.
Dispute Summary
The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by Chatur Knowledge Networking Pvt Ltd as withdrawn, with liberty to raise contentions before the Trademark Registrar. The petitioner had sought to challenge a trademark opposition, but the respondent had filed a notice of opposition within time. The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition, enabling them to pursue their claims before the Trademark Registrar. This decision highlights the importance of procedural compliance in trademark opposition proceedings. The petitioner's decision to withdraw the petition may indicate a strategic move to focus on the opposition proceedings before the Trademark Registrar.
Outcome / Ruling
dismissed
Verdict Document PDF URL
Full text judgment
[Cites 0 , Cited by 0 ] Bombay High Court Chatur Knowledge Networking Private ... vs The Registrar Of Trademark And 2 Ors on 9 July, 2026 907-WP-826-2024.DOC Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2026.07.09 15:11:17 +0530 Chitra Sonawane. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.826 OF 2024 Chatur Knowledge Networking Pvt Ltd through ...Petitioner Director Versus The Registrar of Trademark & Ors. ...Respondents Mr Amit Gharte for the Petitioner. Mr Anjani kumar Singh for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 9th JULY 2026. PC:- 1. Mr. Amit Gharte, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Notice of Opposition has been filed by the Respondent within time. Therefore, the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition, with liberty to raise the contentions involved in the Petition before the Trademark Registrar. The learned Counsel for the Respondents has no objection for the same. As such, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) Page 1 of 1
Cancel
Update Case