Arctic
Invent
Case Registry
Dashboard
Case Explorer
Back to Explorer
Update Case Entry
Manually curate individual case documents inside the PostgreSQL engine.
Case Lawsuit Title
*
Case / Trial ID Number
Jurisdiction Code
*
us
in
upc
eu
Category
*
Patent
Trademark
Copyright
Design
Filing Date
Decision Verdict Date
Court / Tribunal
Bench / Panel Judges
Petitioner / Claimant (Plaintiff)
Kross Limited & Anr
Respondent / Defendant
The Registrar Of Trademarks & Anr
Dispute Summary
The Calcutta High Court has directed the parties to file an affidavit-in-opposition and reply in a trademark opposition matter. The court has adjourned the matter to 7th August, 2026. The petitioners, Kross Limited & Anr, have challenged the decision of the Registrar of Trademarks. The court has asked the parties to deal with the factual issue of service of notice of opposition through affidavits.
Outcome / Ruling
interim_order
Verdict Document PDF URL
Full text judgment
[Cites 0 , Cited by 0 ] Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Kross Limited & Anr vs The Registrar Of Trademarks & Anr on 3 July, 2026 Author: Arindam Mukherjee Bench: Arindam Mukherjee 03.07.2026 Court No.32 DL/Item No.-1 [Milan, A.R. (Ct.)] IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS DIVISION CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA-IPD 2 of 2026 KROSS LIMITED & ANR. VERSUS THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. Mr. Soumya Ray Chowdhury, Mr. Naqeeb Nawab, Ms. Susrea Mitra, Mr. Hamidul Haque ....for the Petitioners Mr. Sunil Singhani, Mr. Tirtha Pati Acharyya ....for the Respondent No.1 1. One of the issues, required to be gone into this application is service of notice of opposition upon the petitioners by the respondent no.1. 2. This is a factual issue, which requires to be dealt with by an affidavit. 3. Let affidavit-in-opposition be filed by 24th July, 2026. Reply thereto, if any, be filed by 4th August, 2026. 4. Let this matter appear on 7th August, 2026. (Arindam Mukherjee, J.)
Cancel
Update Case